``God does not play dice with the universe, " Albert Einstein

1. SCOPE:
In 1935, A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen predicted that "quantum mechanics is not a complete theory" because determinism could be recovered at least under limit conditions (EPR Argument [1]). Studies conducted over decades by a number of mathematicians, physicists and chemists (see their names in the Acknowledgments of Refs. [7]) have indicated that the historical objections against the PER Argument [2] [3] [4] are indeed valid, but only for point-like particles in vacuum under linear, local and Hamiltonian interactions, because extended, therefore deformable particles within hyperdense media under additional non-linear, non-local and non-Hamiltonian interactions represented via isomathematics, isomechanics and isochemistry appear to admit [5] [6]: 1) An explicit and concrete realization of hidden variables; 2) Identical classical counterparts; and 3) The progressive recovering of Einstein's determinism in the interior of hadrons, nuclei and stars, and its full achievement at the limit of gravitational collapse as predicted by Einstein, while jointly removing quantum divergencies. In view of expected implications for all quantitative sciences, including the prediction of much needed, new, clean energies that are inconceivable for quantum mechanics, the scope of the teleconference is to debate, develop and apply the indicated new advances on what appears to be Einstein's most important legacy.

2. DATE:
September 1-5, 2020
from 9 am to 1 pm EST
from 3 to 7 pm CET

3. SESSIONS:

September 1, 2020:
9 am to 12 noon EST:
Inaugural speeches

September 2, 2020:
9 am to 12 noon EST,
Session in Mathematics
Prof. S. Georgiev, Chairman

September 3:
9 am to12 noon EST
Session in Physics
Prof. R. M. Santilli, Chairman

September 4, 2020:
9 am to 12 noon EST
Session in Chemistry,
Prof. A. A. Bhalekar, Chairman

September 5:
9 am to 12 noon EST
Open Discussions.

4. PARTICIPATION:
It is open to all qualified mathematicians, physicists and chemists/biologists at no cost. Financial support is available for qualified speakers. Partecipation Certificates can be issued on request.

5. TELECONFERENCE LINK:
To obtain the link and related information at no cost, please send your curriculum, to admin(at)eprdebates(dot)org with the indication whether the participation is intended as an auditor or as a speaker.

6. LECTURES:
All lectures have to be recorded in advance and be available in the internet prior to the initiation of the teleconference. Lectures can be recorded by speakers at their location or they can be recorded by the organizers via Zoom (at no cost). The duration of all lectures should be from 30 to 50 minutes. . Additionally, the session of September 5, 2020, will be devoted to live questions and answers. Due to the great number of participants, it is important that questions or comments are sent in writing to the individual speaker and in copy to up to August 30, 2020 following the reception of the talk abstracts. Main aspects to be debated:

ARGUMENT 1: Quantum mechanics is exactly valid for point particles in empty space (exterior dynamical problems) with consequential lack of meaningful "completion" of Heisenberg's uncertainties, Bell's inequality, and all that www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/bohr\-/EPRBohr.pdf

ARGUMENT 2: Bell's inequality on lack of classical images is inapplicable (rather than violated) for extended particles within dense hadronic media (interior dynamical problems) due to inevitable non-linear, non-local and non-Hamiltonian interactions that, when properly represented, allow the apparent existence of classical images http://eprdebates.org/docs/epr-paper-i.pdf

ARGUMENT 3: Einstein's determinism is progressively approached by extended particles in the interior of hadrons, nuclei and stars and fully achieved in the interior of gravitational collapse http://eprdebates.org/docs/epr-paper-ii.pdf

7. INTERNET DEBATES:
EPR debate in physics
http://www.eprdebates.org/santilli-confirmation-of-the-epr-argument.php

EPR debate in chemistry
http://www.eprdebates.org/santilli-confirmation-of-the-epr-argument-chemistry.php

Ananda Bosman's interview of Ruggero M. Santilli on Einstein's determinism
http://www.i-b-r.org/ananda-interview-2020.htm

8. ORGANIZER:
The R. M. Santilli Foundation
Email: board(at)santilli-foundation(dot)org

9. INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE "

Prof. Ascar Aringazin
Institute for Basic Research
Eurasian National University
Nur-Sultan, 010008 Kazakhstan
Email: aringazin(at)gmail(dot)com

Prof. Anil A. Bhalekar
Department of Chemistry,
R. T. M. Nagpur University,
Amravati Road Campus, Nagpur, India
Email: anabha(at)hotmail(dot)com

Prof. Jeremy Dunning-Davies
Departments of Mathematics and Physics
University of Hull,England.
Email: masjd(at)masjd.karoo(dot)co.uk

Prof. Svetlin G. Georgiev
Department of Mathematics
Sorbonne University, Paris, France
Email: svetlingeorgiev1(at)gmail(dot)com

Prof. Stein E. Johansen
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Trondheim, Norway
Email: stein.e.johansen(at)ntnu(dot)no

Prof. Noriaki Kamiya
Mathematical Sciences
Aizu university, Japan
Email: shigekamiya(at)outlook(dot)jp

Prof. Pinchas Mandell
Family of Israel Foundation
El-Ram Tower Bialik St. # 74/60
Ramat-Gan Israel, 5241135
Email: info(at)familyofisrael(dot)org

Prof. Fabrizio Maturo
Department of Mathematics and Physics
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Caserta, Italy
Email: fabrizio.maturo(at)unicampania(dot)it

Prof. Ruggero. Maria Santilli
The Institute for Basic Research
Palm Harbor, FL, U.S.A.
Email: research(at)i-b-r(dot)org

Prof. Erik Trell
Linkoping University,
Linkoping, Sweden
Email: erik.trell(at)gmail(dot)com

Prof. Bhadra Man Tuladhar
Department of Mathematics
Kathmandu University
Kathmandu, Nepal
Email: tuladhar2(at)hotmail(dot)com

Prof. Thomas Vougiouklis
Department of Mathematics
Xanthi, Greece
Email: tvougiou(at)eled(dot)duth(dot)gr

10. TUTORING LECTURES:
The viewing of the tutoring lectures listed below is suggested for the understanding of the technical lectures delivered at the conference.

TUTORING I:
ISOMATHEMATICS
Ruggero Maria Santilli
http://www.world-lecture-series.org/santilli-tutoring-i
Duration 0:39:31

TUTORING II:
VERIFICATIONS OF THE EPR ARGUMENT
Ruggero Maria Santilli
http://www.world-lecture-series.org/santilli-tutoring-ii
Duration 0:39:05

TUTORING III:
IMPLICATIONS OF THE EPR ARGUMENT
Ruggero Maria Santilli
http://www.world-lecture-series.org/santilli-tutoring-iii
Duration 0:40:06

TUTORING IV:
LIE-ADMISSIBLE TREATMENT OF IRREVERSIBLE
PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
Ruggero Maria Santilli
PART I
http://www.world-lecture-series.org/santilli-tutoring-iv-part-1
View (Duration 0:36:27)
PART 2
http://www.world-lecture-series.org/santilli-tutoring-iv-part-2
View (Duration 0:33:58)
PART 3
http://www.world-lecture-series.org/santilli-tutoring-iv-part-3
View (Duration 0:29:04)

TUTORING V:
EXTENDING MATHEMATICAL METHODS FROM
NUMBERS TO HYPERNUMBERS AND TO H_v NUMBERS
Thomas Vougiouklis
http://www.world-lecture-series.org/vougiouklis-extending-mathematical-methods-from-numbers-to-hypernumbers-and-to-h_v-numbers
View (Duration 0:52:25)

11. SUGGESTED REFERENCES.

[1] A. Einstein, B. Podolsky , and N. Rosen, "Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?,'' Phys. Rev., vol.~47 , p. 777 (1935),
http://www.eprdebates.org/docs/epr-argument.pdf

[3] J. S. Bell: "On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox" Physics Vol. 1, 195 (1964),
https://cds.cern.ch/record/111654/files/vol1p195-200_001.pdf

[4] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "Bell's Theorem" (2019)
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bell-theorem

[5] R. M. Santilli, "Isorepresentation of the Lie-isotopic SU(2) Algebra with Application to Nuclear Physics and Local Realism," Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Vol. 50, 177 (1998),
http://www.eprdebates.org/docs/epr-paper-i.pdf

[6] R. M. Santilli, "Studies on the classical determinism predicted by A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen," Ratio Mathematica Volume 37, pages 5-23 (2019),
http://www.eprdebates.org/docs/epr-paper-ii.pdf

[7] R.M. Santilli, "Studies on A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen prediction that quantum mechanics is not a complete theory,"

Paper I: "Basic methods,"
Ratio Mathematica Volume 38, pp. 5-69, 2020
http://eprdebates.org/docs/epr-review-i.pdf

Paper II: "Apparent proof of the EPR argument,"
Ratio Mathematica Volume 38, pp. 71-138, 2020
http://eprdebates.org/docs/epr-review-ii.pdf

Paper III: "Illustrative examples and applications,"
Ratio Mathematica Volume 38, pp. 139-222, 2020
http://eprdebates.org/docs/epr-review-iii.pdf